WatchReviewBlog

Wrist Watch Reviews, Guides & Advice

  • HOME
  • WATCH REVIEWS
  • BY BRAND
  • By Type
    • Automatic Watches
    • Quartz Watches
    • Dive Watches
    • Pilot Watches
    • Chronographs
    • Dress
    • Luxury
    • Sports
    • Women’s
    • Fashion
  • Sections
    • Introducing
    • Startups
    • Watch Q&A
  • Watch Buying Guides
ShopShow Search
Hide Search
Home » Watch Reviews » Omega Speedmaster Reduced II 3539.50.00 Watch Review

Omega Speedmaster Reduced II 3539.50.00 Watch Review

July 13, 2018 by Ulises Valenzuela 8 Comments — Updated on January 22, 2024

Omega Speedmaster Reduced II 3539.50.00 Watch Review

The Speedmaster needs no introduction. Originally conceived as a racing chronograph, it nevertheless became forever associated with the space race after the reference 105.012 was worn by Buzz Aldrin on the Moon in 1969. However, as popular as the Moonwatch might be, there are countless variants and limited editions that are as worthy of attention as the acclaimed “Man on the Moon”. Smaller in size and powered by an automatic movement, the Reduced is one of such variants. First introduced in 1988 with the reference 3510.50, today we will be taking a look at the upgraded reference 3539.50 (Reduced II) which sports a cleaner dial, increased water resistance and a vastly improved clasp.

Reduced II pushers and crown

The crown sits lower than the pushers in the Reduced.

Before diving further into the review, let’s take a look at the specs first:

  • Full reference: 3539.50.00
  • Movement: Omega 3220 (ETA 2892 as base, chrono module Dubois-Dépraz 2020 on top)
  • Power reserve: 40 hours
  • Case size: 39 mm
  • Sapphire crystal
  • Lug-to-lug: 44 mm
  • Lug width: 18 mm
  • Height: 13 mm

Reduced II First Impressions

When I first received the Reduced, the first thing that I noticed is the size difference compared to the current Moonwatch. It felt much smaller than the reported 39 mm case size. According to today’s standards, it could easily be dismissed as a ladies’ watch. Nothing further from the truth. After exclusively wearing it for a week, I grew fond of the size which, I will have to admit, goes perfectly with my 6-inch wrists. The only deviation from its bigger brother is the placement of the pushers and crown. Since the Omega 3220 is a combination of two movements, the crown sits a little lower than the pushers. The exquisite finish of the case matches that of the Moonwatch, with alternating brushed and polished edges at the lugs.

Dial up close

Sub-dial placement on the Reduced is more spaced-out than in the Moonwatch. Also note the seconds sub-dial at 9 o’clock.

Dial & Crown

Another important difference between the Reduced and the Moonwatch can be found in the dial. At first glance, they look almost identical, but upon further inspection, one can notice that the space between the sub-dials is quite different. Even more apparent is the 3 o’clock placement of the small seconds sub-dial on the Reduced versus the original placement at 9 o’clock on the Moonwatch. The Omega 3220 movement itself is very precise and can keep track of time for up to 12 hours. As with all choronographs, though, its best not to operate the pushers underwater. The watch can be manually wound using the signed crown, in case you would like to stick to the more traditional feel of the “Man on the Moon”.

On chess board

3539.50 on a Hirsch leather strap.

Crystal Variations

Potential Reduced buyers should carefully consider whether they prefer a hesalite or sapphire crystal. The original Reduced 3510.50 used a hesalite crystal, which is much more prone to scratches than sapphire, but gives the dial a warm appearance that sapphire cannot match. Plus, the distortions achieved by the hesalite version are arguably more beautiful than the ones on the sapphire upgraded version. Advantages of the sapphire crystal include a 100m water resistance rating, and a nearly perfect resistance to scratches.

Lume shot on wrist

SuperLuminova on the 3539.50 glowing rather nicely. Do not be fooled by the picture, though. In real life, all my eyes can see is green, not blue.

Wrist Comfort – Functionality

The bracelet is as comfortable as the one on the Bond Seamaster, widely considered one of the most comfortable bracelets in the business. Very similar in looks to the President-style Rolex bracelet, it is quite easy to fit owing to its small links. It has a very vintage vibe that matches perfectly with the case. Just for fun, though, I decided to replace the bracelet with a Hirsch brown leather strap, making it very similar to the First Omega in Space, another famous watch from the Speedmaster line. Due to the monochrome look of the dial, this watch is a strap monster and can be fashionably paired with leather, nato, and perlon straps.

Engraved back

The caseback of the 3539.50. Serial number edited.

Being a chronograph, the 3539.50 is not required to display an impressive amount of luminescence, unlike a diver’s watch. However, the amount of SuperLuminova used here is quite adequate, and makes for a very elegant look in the dark. Do note that the maximum brightness fades quickly, though.

On the back of the case we can observe a simple design. The small hippocampus graces the center of the caseback, while the Omega anti-counterfeit hologram is etched on the edge. Nothing to write home about here.

Buckle clasp

The push-button clasp is a classic example of the 90’s and 00’s Omega style, with the text “Omega Speedmaster” engraved on it. Nowadays, perhaps for cost reasons, most Omega watches will only display “Omega” on the clasp.

All in all, this is a great alternative to the more expensive Moonwatch, especially for those of us firmly established in the small wrist size club. Being a discontinued model, a potential buyer would have to look in the used market. Prices for the earlier hesalite version can go up to $1800 for a reasonable condition model, while the latter sapphire version can be found for up to $2500, which, in my opinion, is a pretty fair price to pay for the automatic version of one of the most famous watches in modern history.

Filed Under: Featured, Luxury, Watch Reviews Tagged With: Automatic Watches, Chronographs

About Ulises Valenzuela

Ulises's love for watches sparked at the wee age of five years old. Fast forward to today and he is now a chemical engineer by profession, with a side passion for mechanical watches, especially Swiss.

Comments

  1. JoeMama says

    February 15, 2020 at 12:22 pm

    I bought mine from Crown and Caliber that was in impeccable condition with no scratches at all. They said it was from a collector and it came with papers and the box which was a plus. I had the same initial impressions about the size but have since fallen in love with the perfect 39 size as my wrist isn’t that big at all. If I feel like wearing a bigger watch the. I’ll go with my Seamaster GMT 50th anniversary or Bulova Lunar pilot that is a huge 45. I love the fact I don’t have to wind it, 100 meter water resist (better than the pro) and I paid only $1950 for it.

    Reply
    • Ulises Valenzuela says

      February 15, 2020 at 9:47 pm

      Awesome! Thanks for stopping by and sharing.

      Reply
    • Ashleigh says

      April 14, 2021 at 10:02 am

      Whalen did you purchase your Speedmaster Reduced.
      In what currency is $1950 ?

      Reply
  2. Bob Weiniger says

    October 15, 2020 at 2:10 am

    I love this watch; it’s PERFECTLY sized for my wrist, while retaining that iconic Speedmaster air. Just one question…why doesn’t anyone ever mention the Tachymeter dial being different on SOME but not all automatic models!

    Reply
    • Ulises Valenzuela says

      October 15, 2020 at 4:18 pm

      Hey, thanks for stopping by! I wasn’t aware of the tachymeter being different on some models. Care to elaborate?

      Reply
  3. Ron says

    April 28, 2023 at 12:39 pm

    That $1950 is now at $3800 LOL!

    Reply
  4. Jorge Romero says

    March 9, 2024 at 9:55 am

    Under rated watch out my opinion. Likewise for many of the variations that have been produced.

    Reply
  5. Paul Gregory says

    February 2, 2025 at 3:32 pm

    I just got my speedy3950, I love it. Brilliant reviews thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get fresh watch reviews, HD photos and more direct to your inbox.

RECENT POSTS

  • Flash From the Past: The Stowa Flieger Classic Pilot Chrono
  • The Nomadic Fior 555: A Stunning GMT Watch Made in Ireland
  • The Rolex Land-Dweller: Two Birds One Stone
  • Casio Deep Dive: An Ode to the Classics
  • What’s the Most Useless Watch Complication?

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get fresh watch reviews, HD photos and more direct to your inbox.

INFORMATION

  • About
  • Masthead
  • Editorial Policy
CONTACT

  • General
  • Advertise
CONNECT
  • facebook
  • x
  • instagram
  • pinterest
  • youtube
Copyright © 2025 · WatchReviewBlog.com · All Rights Are Reserved! · Powered by Custom Dev · Privacy Policy